*Note: contains more serious stuff than usual*
This post has been a thought writhing at the back of my mind for a
few days now, and today on my drive home from school, I realized there
was no good reason not to put it down in blog form. Well, okay, there
was one reason: it has absolutely nothing to do with Taiwan. It does,
however, give you a glimpse of what I do here other than teach, meet MLB
players and write blog posts, so that's something.
When
I'm not off being productive, I often watch TV on my computer; when
I've run through the week's new episodes of my favorite series (Saturday
Night Live, How I Met Your Mother, The Office, and Bones, all viewable
by me online the afternoon after they air in the States), I turn to
watching House. House, for those who don't know it, is essentially a
show about medical diagnoses; I've heard it described as a medical
detective story, which is a pretty apt description, if you add in a steady flow of sardonic humor
from the title doctor.
 |
| "I'm smarter than you and I hate people. Therefore, I will now mock you mercilessly. Trust me, it'll be fun!" |
I'd heard it was good, and so far, it is--though watching more
than two in a row is a bad idea, as with any TV show that uses a
distinctive formula (ope, it's only 23 minutes in. This isn't the real
diagnosis; his liver has to fail first. Why the liver? I don't know, but
the show's pretty consistent on this.)
When I got here, I
had never seen more than one episode, but had heard it was good, so I
started at the beginning and went from there. I'm currently halfway
through season 3.
"So what?" you say. "What makes this worthy of a blog post?"
The
other day, I got to an episode which broke from all of House's standard
patterns. There was no patient with unusual symptoms, no endless series
of tests and arguments to determine what he or she had. No, they knew
what this patient had, or rather they knew what had happened to her: she
had been raped. The episode, called "One Day, One Room," dealt with the
fact that the woman refused to talk to anyone about it except for
House, who, given his character, had absolutely no interest in talking
to her. It turned, essentially, into a battle of wills.
In other words, it was a character-driven episode.
Now, usually, those are my favorites; I love going deeper into the lives
and thoughts of the characters who populate the series' world. This
time, however, was a little different.
See, the major
turning point in the story--you know, the inevitable plot twist that
always comes about halfway through--was that the woman was pregnant as a
result of the rape. As House delivers the news, he launches immediately
into "Termination is not a pleasant procedure..." and gets interrupted,
as we learn that the woman is a Christian and believes that life begins
at conception, and has absolutely no intention of having an abortion.
My
first reaction: "Wow, I'm glad they gave that perspective to such a
sympathetic character!" Then she keeps talking, and parroting the most
empty and fatalistic version of Christianity I've ever heard. "But even
so," I think, "We genuinely feel for her and respect her character."
The
show goes on; eventually House opens up to the girl and she tells him
about her horrible experience; they have a bonding moment through
sharing pain, and she is no longer suffering psychologically now (I
guess?) so the hospital can discharge her. Nothing more is mentioned on
the subject of abortion.
Nothing, that is, until the
final scene. As House tells his boss about the case, he says "She
terminated, and was discharged." The boss nods as if that were perfectly
normal and asks him how it happened.
WHAT?! Here we had a strong female character who is
vehemently anti-abortion, to the point where she is not only willing but
adamant that she will carry to term a baby who came about as a result
of a rape, and suddenly we, the audience, are supposed to not only
accept a complete 180 in her stance for no apparent reason, but applaud
the doctors who brought it about. I'm sorry, but even if you're
pro-choice, isn't it the
woman's choice that's supposed to
matter? How could it ever be even marginally ethical for a doctor to use
the doctor-patient intimacy to push someone into changing their core
beliefs?
Granted, House is a show about doctors
performing marginally ethical practices to accomplish their own goals.
But this wasn't even presented in the light of "House being House and
doing what he wants regardless of patients." That sort of thing gets him
yelled at. Actually, this wasn't presented in any sort of light;
rather, it was seen as a foregone conclusion: once her psychological
wounds healed, she would obviously see the light and agree to have an
abortion. And I, for one, find that hugely offensive.
I
didn't really go into this intending to perform a full-on argument on
the issue of abortion; I guess I'll know if people actually read my blog
or not by whether or not this sparks people off on a huge debate. But
it's been gnawing at me, goading me on to express outrage where outrage
is due. Because, though House does exist in a fictional world, it is a
fictional world meant for public consumption. And if the public eye is
so used to tying together irrationality and refusing abortion that it
would accept this episode without outrage, it might just need a little writhing idea planted in its consciousness.